🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.